If a security exploit is found in something they both share, both versions will be vulnerable, if it's found only in a new bit of code in pepper flash only then only pepper flash will be vulnerable, and if it's in a bit of code that's in flash-plugin which has been changed in pepper flash then only flash-plugin will be vulnerable. So, both adobe flash and pepper flash get security updates (not sure how long adobe will fix security problems in normal flash for), pepper flash gets new features and normal updates whereas flash-plugin is EOL and no new features will be added. PPAPI is not compatible with NPAPI so someone write an abstraction to allow it to work on firefox or other things. Somehow google convinced abode to work with them on adding new features to the PPAPI flash plugin, so it gets new features, this is what you get with pepper flash. Google however has PPAPI which is what chrome uses. Because Flash Player is a relatively old plug-in, it has become increasingly vulnerable to online threats like viruses and hackers. There are a few reasons for this decline in popularity. They use different APIs for interaction, adobe flash uses NPAPI (netscape API) which was dumped by adobe and they no longer add new features to it, it's security updates only. Although Flash Player has long been one of the most well-known plug-ins, it has become much less popular in recent years.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |